Mathieu Landretti photo from Facebook. Mathieu delves into the 2016 election in the second installment of our interview. |
PART 1 OF INTERVIEW HERE: https://4tpack.blogspot.com/2018/01/minnesota-millennial-power-politics_3.html
In Part 2 of our three-part interview, we learn more about Mathieu Landretti's thoughts and activities during the 2016 election, and where he thinks we as a country can go from there.
In Part 2 of our three-part interview, we learn more about Mathieu Landretti's thoughts and activities during the 2016 election, and where he thinks we as a country can go from there.
-What was your take on the 2016 election?
Things/issues/people you enjoyed witnessing, things you didn't, etc.
"In my opinion, the
2016 election was a rude awakening.
This election exposed the anger and
discontent of the American people who have felt betrayed by their leaders. This
bitterness towards the political establishment manifested itself in two key
figures: Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.
Bernie Sanders represented progressive left-wing populism, and Donald
Trump represented regressive right-wing populism.
The people gravitated
towards populism because they have realized that for the past few decades,
their “representatives” are representing them less and less.
They are tired of
being manipulated by leaders who ignore their cries for help. They wanted a
leader who would dramatically alter the status quo.
Photo from Pexels. A 2014 study from Northwestern and Princeton Universities found that the United States is effectively an oligarchy. |
From what I have
gathered, the people who voted for Hillary Clinton where not voting for her
because they were excited about Hillary Clinton; they were voting against
Trump.
We have a lot of
problems in this country: crumbling infrastructure, growing wealth inequality,
never-ending wars, a college loan crisis, loss of manufacturing jobs, an
exploitative health insurance system, and the list goes on.
Hillary Clinton’s
campaign symbolized a continuation of these issues. She was pro free trade, supported
interventionism, and had no interest in progressing beyond Obamacare to single
payer.
To many people, Trump
offered change. His rhetoric was popular. (I must note that I am only
discussing his rhetoric not his actions).
It spoke to white working-class people.
Setting aside his racism and bigotry, a lot of what Trump said on the campaign
trail was good.
He said no to the TPP and out sourcing; he said he was not
going to cut Medicare and Social Security; he was going to get us out of
Afghanistan.
This said, he also played to many people’s
fears by scapegoating the three M’s: Muslims, Minorities, and Migrants.
He also
talked about killing/torturing innocent foreign civilians and bringing back
unconstitutional “stop and frisk” laws.
Contrary to Trump’s
campaign trail promises, he is filling the swamp with more sewage and polluting
our politics further.
Bernie Sanders also
represented change, but unlike Trump, Sanders does not—how do I put it nicely?—pose
a threat to our democracy. As ironic as it is, Sanders was a new face in the
political mainstream even though he has spent his entire life in politics.
His
ideas and message brought people together, unlike Trump who divided and
conquered. He spoke about issues that were not politically acceptable in the
past two decades.
He spoke about single
payer health care, raising the minimum wage, unions and workers’ rights, among
other issues which would have most politicians ridiculed as “communists” and
“un-American”.
This tells me that the paradigm is shifting left.
These issues
can no longer be ignored. Americans are moving beyond the “red scare” and
“McCarthyism.” He has inspired a movement that I believe will influence voters
to elect progressives in the 2018 and 2020 elections.
Sanders campaign has
single handedly mobilized young people, senior citizens, conservatives, and
liberals to come together and fight for progressive issues.
Mathieu Landretti at a 2017 Climate March |
I’m not going to lie.
I had a lot of fun following this election cycle. It was so uncouth and
unpredictable that the news was comparable to reality television.
This said, it
was also sickening. The treatment of political dialogue in this country is heavily
skewed; we no longer engage in honest debate.
None of the so called “liberals”
in government represent the real left in America, and the conservatives in our
government are far off in the extreme right.
Our corrupt two party system has
moved the Overton window (the window of acceptable political dialogue) so far
to the right it has become impossible to have reasonable debate.
In summary, like most
progressives, I was disappointed with the outcome. Although Trump’s victory was
hard to watch, it was harder to watch Bernie Sanders lose."
-Were you able to take on some roles and
activities during the 2016 race?
"At the time I was
enrolled in a College political science course through the U of M.
During that
time I served as an election judge and began analyzing current events and
public policy. I also co-created a Bernie Sanders web page to promote his
campaign, and it became the most popular web site my friend Roman and I ever
made.
My political activism
did not begin until after the election. Trump was a wakeup call.
Since his
election, I have gone to several meetings on the environment/ Keystone pipeline
and took part in the 350.org climate change march. More recently, I have
attended four meetings on the Minnesota Health Plan; I intend to become more
involved in the fight for Medicare for all in the coming future."
HealthCare For All Minnesota is an organization devoted to creating single-payer healthcare in the state. Photo from the Itasca County DFL |
-What is your take on our current political system
under President Donald Trump?
"I think it is
imperative that we watchdog our government.
We as citizens cannot be
complacent. It is far too easy to make an angry Facebook post or yell at your
relatives at Thanksgiving about the election.
We as Americans need to act.
Whether that takes the form of making phone calls, protesting, or running for
office, we as citizens need to act.
Although I despise
Trump, I do believe his presidency could be used as a catalyst for change.
In today’s
political climate, all eyes are on Trump.
Never before have we seen anything
like this.
Trump’s presence by itself shocks people.
We are already seeing
grassroots movements springing up in the wake of Trumps disruption of our
democratic institutions.
We now have progressive movements such as Our
Revolution, Justice Democrats, Demand Progress, and here in Minnesota, MN
Health Care for All. I believe that if another establishment Republican or
Democrat had won in 2016, we would see a continuation corporatism and
corruption without protest.
This said, we must be
careful that Trump does not cause too much destruction before he is out of
office. We can do this by mobilizing. As economist Robert Reich says,
“Americans need to move beyond outrage and into action.”
Comments
Post a Comment